Bears and Our World

The question of reintroducing the bears must be answered soon, but to do so we msut The main implication to take into consideration surrounding the grizzly bears is that of biological diversity. What does that mean for us as humans? The National Wildlife Federation defines biological diversity as “the variety of life”, claiming that the way living organisms interplay can be one of the most difficult to understand concepts in the realm of science. The importance of biodiversity cannot be overstated. Biodiversity is a huge contributor to our wonderfully stocked grocery stores, diverse plant life, and beautiful nature. Every year scientists discover new medicines from the genetics of plants and animals as a result of the diversity of wildlife on this Earth. Biodiversity strengthens ecosystems, increases resistance to animal-borne disease, and altogether makes this world the wonder that it is. Grizzly bears, and any other extinct or endangered species, are or have been at some point a critical component of this diversity, and we as humans can’t afford to endure any more environmental deficits than we currently face, nor should we have to.

happy bear

Smiling grizzly; courtesy of Animalia Life

Although residents of California may be wary of having an apex predator in such close proximity to their homes, they can rest easy knowing that many scientists have deliberated over this proposal and have determined that plenty of space would be allocated for the bears in the Sierra Nevada wilderness far from urban areas if the reintroduction was implemented. With grizzly bears eating mainly roots and berries, and scavenging off of animal carcasses, they pose little threat to humans unless directly threatened. However, those circumstances can easily be avoided by practicing general bear safety like keeping distance and making your presence known while hiking or camping. As seen with the reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park, species that were once eradicated can indeed be successfully brought back to their native habitats, not only without threatening humans but with amazing benefits to the ecosystem and livelihood of the environment.


Grizzly bear and cub via North American Bear Center

We have been given an opportunity as a species to help another come back to life, an opportunity to reverse a bad decision from 100 years ago. As we tackle global warming, drought, and renewable energy sources among other issues, disappearing species shouldn’t be a factor. We owe it to ourselves, to the animals to whom we are more similar than we think, and to the Earth that we live on and are currently destroying. Reintroducing the grizzly bear population into California is a big first step in conquering one of the many problems we face, and it is such an important one to start working on.


Homes for Wolves and Bears Alike

Now, you may be thinking that grizzly bears are dangerous and shouldn’t be allowed to return to such a densely populated state. Surely the government won’t agree to this. However, it may be surprising to know that gray wolves, another apex predator, are ever present in populated communities in America and Canada. In fact, gray wolves have had very successful reintroductions and reappearances in both Yellowstone National Park and Northern California in the past several decades, making me even more confident that reintroduction of bears would have huge success along with undebatable benefits.

After being exterminated from the greater Yellowstone are in the early 1900’s, gray wolves were reintroduced to the nation’s first national park in 1995. Since then, staggering effects have been observed.Although gray wolves used to extend over two-thirds of the United States, today their population is limited to several states. Biologists began brainstorming ideas about wolf reintroduction and soon after the first set of wolves were brought in from Canada. Efforts were made to allow the wolves to feel at home in the park, including the planting of elk carcasses by scientists.


Grey wolf howling; courtesy of

The wolves stayed and made a home, and are now thriving in Yellowstone National Park as they did before their extirpation. Similar circumstances in Northern California, including more than enough allotted habitat, and scientists and organizations to monitor grizzly bears, create a potentially successful reintroduction for the bears, as Yellowstone created for the wolves.

The ecological benefits are very apparent as well. With the wolves mitigating the elk population, river bank plants and trees have begun to grow back, creating homes for beavers, otters and songbirds, food for bears, and hiding places for small mammals such as rabbits and mice.The biological diversity of the river ecosystem has bloomed, with many species of fish returning to successful living.


Wolves in Yellowstone National Park chase after an elk in deep snow. Photo by Dan Stahler of NPS

The quality of the water has greatly improved as well. The magnificent animals attract millions of visitors a year, bringing in lots of revenue for the National Park Service to continue maintaining beautiful parks for us to visit. Overall, the benefits that the wolves have created are far greater than anyone could’ve expected. Grizzly bears are crucial to ecological and biological diversity as well. By foraging for berries, distributing plant species, and monitoring large mammal populations such as elk, they help keep the balance of the ecosystem in check.

Although the gray wolf was never officially reintroduced to California, a small population has crossed the Oregon border into Northern California and called it home. Beginning in December 2011 when an Oregon wolf, designated OR7, wandered south into Siskiyou County as the first wild wolf in California in 87 years. OR7 journeyed over 700 miles to California and has traveled back and forth between California and Oregon for several years since. 


Grey wolf OR7’s journey through California; from CBD

Because of OR7’s journey into California, the Fish and Game Commission voted to add the Gray wolf to the state Endangered Species list, immediately protecting OR7 and any other wolves from harm by unhappy farmers, eager hunters, and the like. The petition for the gray wolf asserted that “suitable habitat still exists in California…Wolves are highly adaptable and have the ability to thrive in myriad geographical and climatic conditions throughout California”. In response to this new acceptance and protection of gray wolves, a small pack, referred to as the Shasta Pack, has moved into Siskiyou County in Northern California. As of August 2015, the pack consists of two adult wolves and five pups. This is the first pack seen in California since the last one was exterminated in 1924. Conservationists are excited about the wolves’ return and believe it was only a matter of time, as wolves did once roam free in the Sierra Nevada Mountains before they were killed off. The optimism surrounding the wolves’ return only brightens the prospect of grizzly bears returning to California as well. With the success of the wolves, it is highly likely and scientifically supported that grizzlies would thrive in their previously inhabited environment as well, as it is plenty of room and well away from populated areas.

With the success of gray wolves returning to several previously inhabited locations, I see very little argument against the return of the grizzly bear. By reintroducing the bear to California’s ecosystem, an amazing chain-reaction of events is likely to occur as it did with the wolves in Yellowstone. Major ecological changes and improvements would be made, on top of the opportunity it would bring for California to foster the perfect home for the big, brown, fuzzy creatures. Why should we deny an animal the right to live where it has its entire life? We wouldn’t like it much if it were the other way around, now would we…?


Wolf and bear together: a rare sight; photo by Lassi Rautiainen


All in Favor, Say “I”!


Yosemite National Park; courtesy of J. Harrison Photo

Yosemite National Park in California is one of the best known National Parks in the country due to Half Dome’s recognizable silhouette, the famous Yosemite Falls, and the notorious climbing history behind El Capitan. But very few people know the story of the grizzly bear associated with Yosemite. A Park Ranger from Yosemite National Park posted a journal detailing the past presence of grizzly bears in Yosemite and bears impact on his life. The name Yosemite is thought to come from a manipulation of the Miwok word for grizzly bear, “uzumati”. In fact, the park, located in the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California, was once native habitat for the California grizzly bear, before its extinction in 1924. Now the only bears in Yosemite are black bears. Not to mention, Yosemite Valley was first stumbled upon in 1849 by a group of European hunters who were following tracks of none other than a grizzly bear. The Ranger accounts his time spent in Yellowstone National Park, explaining how he lived in close proximity to grizzlies and other wildlife, and although he had to exercise extreme caution when hiking, any bear encounters resulted in the bears minding their own business and doing their best to stay away. He asserts that “the chance to observe an apex predator in the wild more than made up for the personal habits [he] had to alter”. I wholeheartedly agree with this Park Ranger and his sentiments about the grizzly bear population, and with his idea that the chance to coexist with and witness these incredible creatures would be more than worth the adjustments needed to make reintroduction possible. As important environmental factors, and as a cultural symbol of my home state of California, the grizzly bear truly deserves the chance to return to its former home.

Check out this video of a mother grizzly bear teaching her cubs to fish!

only did grizzly bears once make their homes in the Sierra Nevada and coastal regions of California, they were considered a keystone species that played crucial roles in the shaping of the environment and local ecosystems. Disappearance of grizzly bears results in less species regulation of animals such as deer or elk, which graze in fields and reduce plant density. This can then have larger effects on small mammals and migratory birds. Grizzlies are also huge helpers when it comes to biological diversity of plants. By foraging for berries and spreading seeds via their fur, the bears help to create a diverse ecosystem that can sustain the thousands of other species within it.


Grizzly bear foraging for berries, courtesy of National Geographic

As a threatened species under the Fish and Wildlife Service designation of Endangered Species, the grizzly bear needs some help. Noah Greenwald from the Center for Biological Diversity writes for the Los Angeles Times, claiming that the Fish and Wildlife service has a “legal duty under the Endangered Species Act [to] work to return grizzly bears to a larger portion of their suitable habitat across the West. This includes the Sierra Nevada, where scientists have identified sufficient space for a bear population.” After years of experience with these large mammals and other apex species, humans have enough knowledge to remain safe in reasonably close proximity with grizzly bears. This same article presents statistics from Yellowstone National Park claiming that there is only a 1 in 3 million chance of being attacked or injured by a grizzly bear in the park, where the bear population exceeds 800 animals. The Center for Biological Diversity has researched potential habitats for the bears and has concluded that 110,000 square miles of habitat exists in the West, including land in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. This total amount of land would be enough for a healthy population of up to 6,000 grizzly bears to thrive. Although some may fear the danger grizzly bears present as large predatory animals, research supports the claim that the bears would be reintroduced a safe distance from developed areas and as wild animals shouldn’t be approached or threatened, as these are mostly the only causes for bear attacks.


Grizzly bear in Yellowstone National Park, courtesy of LA Times

The grizzly bear is a prominent symbol of the State of California, featured on the flag and as the state animal, as well as the mascot for many California high school and colleges. It produces a strong sense of unique culture, and we as Californians represent ourselves as the Bear Flag State, asserting our strength and our pride with the image of this fierce and majestic animal. In addition to the sense of pride we get from the Bear Flag, grizzly bears are also an extremely sought after species for wildlife enthusiasts and explorers. These remarkable animals draw the respect of so many people, now it is time to put that respect to good use and bring the bears home.

The Origin and Debate of the Bear Crisis


California State Flag; courtesy of Wikipedia

It is fair to assume that almost everyone is familiar with the California State flag, especially the grizzly bear poised on the patch of green grass. 


Monarch on display at the California Academy of Sciences

What most people aren’t aware of is that the grizzly bear on the flag is the only one left in the entire state, and his name is Monarch. Monarch was brought to Golden Gate Park in San Francisco in 1889 and kept in a
cage until his death in 1911, when his pelt was stuffed and given to the California Academy of Sciences for display. Following the San Francisco Earthquake of 1906, Monarch became the 
symbol of recovery for the area, and he was soon adopted as the symbol on the state flag. 

The grizzly bear used to have widespread populations throughout the state before early settlers came for the Gold Rush in 1948. Because of the seemingly aggressive and threatening nature of Ursus arctos californicus, explorers didn’t hesitate to seek out and kill as many grizzlies as they could. Since the first expeditions across the continent, 98% of the historical grizzly bear population has been eliminated in the American West.

Within the past few years, efforts have been made to reach out to state and federal wildlife organizations concerning the topic of reintroducing the grizzly bear into California where it once roamed freely. One of these organizations, The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), created a petition in July 2015 to the California Fish and Wildlife Commission campaigning for the return of the threatened grizzly bear after their appeals to the federal government fell flat. CBD believes that the reintroduction of the grizzly bear into over 8,000 square miles of wilderness in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, once their native habitat, would be successful in welcoming back the majestic animal that once called the state home, as well as open the door for more wildlife protection and conservation in the West.

In opposition to the grizzly reintroduction, many people feel that it would be dangerous and unwise to bring the large predator back. California is

Screen Shot 2016-01-31 at 3.12.32 PM

Grizzly taking a snow bath, photo by Devin Manky; courtesy of National Geographic

populated with many people, and the bears would have only a limited range of wilderness area, beyond which lies human habitat where the bears could potentially pose a threat. Addressing the fact that the bears were once exterminated in California, Erin Hauge from the Sacramento Bee claims that the extinction of the California grizzly shows exactly how that story ends. In addition to her fears about human encounters, Erin states, “the loss of the California grizzly bear speaks for all endangered species. Let the grizzly on California’s state flag serve to honor those great bears who once roamed the mountains and grasslands of California with impunity.”

An incident in Tulare County, California in November of last year highlights the conflicting aspects of bear reintroduction. Wildlife Biologist Evan King and reporter Ezra David Romero were on their way to Kaweah Oaks Preserve to explore what the environment looked like before settlers moved into almost every open area in the state when they received a call about a black bear that was sighted very close to a school. Although the bear was only sleeping in a tree, imagine if it were a grizzly bear, which can be as large as 2,000 pounds. The risks reintroduction poses are difficult to weigh against the optimistic result of allowing an extinct species to once again flourish.